NERO LARP :: Forums :: Main Category :: Rules Discussion
 
<< Previous thread | Next thread >>
Disarm/ arm trap
Moderators: Administrator, KatieMueller, AdamTaylor, jvalenti, Clint, NickDenny, ShellyHollon, KnightofEvendarr, jasonmote, JSchneider, fdhogan, DDS, jvalentinero, BrianCook, dcashel
Author Post
Frog
Mon Apr 23 2012, 07:43AM
frog
Registered Member #17
Joined: Mon Aug 08 2011, 09:49AM
Posts: 86

Is there a reason that Disarm/arm trap is listed as a "can buy multiple times" skill in the skills table (pg32 of the PDF) or is that simply a type o ?

thanks
Back to top
DanComstock
Mon Apr 23 2012, 02:18PM

Registered Member #10
Joined: Mon Aug 08 2011, 09:45AM
Posts: 259
That's a typo. Once you learn how to disarm traps, you can play with any trap in the game.
Back to top
Frog
Mon Apr 23 2012, 04:44PM
frog
Registered Member #17
Joined: Mon Aug 08 2011, 09:49AM
Posts: 86
Thanks for the quick reply.

one other quick check. The Nat DB allows for multiple purchases of Pick Lock is there a reason for this , such as chapters having "leveled locks" or is this something I need to ask Bill to check out.


Once again thank you
Back to top
DanComstock
Mon Apr 23 2012, 07:42PM

Registered Member #10
Joined: Mon Aug 08 2011, 09:45AM
Posts: 259
I haven't heard anything about multiple purchases of pick locks.

Is anybody in one of those chapters where lockpicks are illegal know about this? Otherwise I'd say it's an error.



In case you're curious what states allow lockpicks, here's a list. (TL;DR: possession of lockpicks is illegal in Kansas, Missouri, and Virginia.)

Back to top
Frog
Mon Apr 23 2012, 08:57PM
frog
Registered Member #17
Joined: Mon Aug 08 2011, 09:49AM
Posts: 86

Thanks again
Back to top
bill
Tue Apr 24 2012, 01:10AM
bill
Registered Member #25
Joined: Mon Aug 08 2011, 09:53AM
Posts: 250
not an error as I explained in a previous email.

Thank You
Back to top
Frog
Tue Apr 24 2012, 01:26AM
frog
Registered Member #17
Joined: Mon Aug 08 2011, 09:49AM
Posts: 86
Sorry I should not have implied it was an error, as you did explain that is was for the incidents I described above. I apologize.
But now we have a Nat rules response.

Frog
Back to top
 

Jump:     Back to top

Syndicate this thread: rss 0.92 Syndicate this thread: rss 2.0 Syndicate this thread: RDF
Powered by e107 Forum System